- We don't run ads to preserve our neutrality
- We don’t charge our readers as we believe that free access to news is a universal right
- We are committed to bringing you unbiased news.
Pan-democrats could persuade protesters to claim the US-sponsored act as a moral victory, vent their steam through the district council elections and win bigger support to revisit universal suffrage in the Legislative Council
The United States’ Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act, which was just passed by the Senate, is remarkable as much for its attempt to champion a city far across the Pacific as for its unprecedented bipartisanship. Ironically, Hong Kong – with its sharply polarised society – has wrought political unity in a country riven by righteous rage.
The act may have a limited positive effect on Hong Kong’s fortunes but will certainly drive a bigger wedge between Washington and Beijing in their damaging trade war. The implied threat that Hong Kong may lose its special freewheeling trade status to deny China an economic lifeline runs the risk of transforming a weakening territory into a non-asset for both China and the West. Could the doctor kill the patient?
If Hong Kong lost its lustre as a bargaining chip for trade, Taiwan, and capital inflow, it would hasten the end of “one country, two systems”. This would be devastating for the embattled territory.
Rule of law is what enables Hong Kong’s high level of autonomy and freedoms. As former judge Henry Litton rightly stressed, common law holds the territory together and makes it such a valuable player on the financial stage. He argues that strengthening, not weakening, “one country, two systems” might encourage Beijing to extend the common-law lease after 2047.
Click here to view original news page at www.scmp.com
